1995-02-06 - Re: “encrypt tcp connections” hacks

Header Data

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
Message Hash: ba9feb193c3b72e9a43c125420a62744e7c7e88aa01fd0f664b3483e3d7b72bb
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950206130709.20818A-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
Reply To: <9502061025.AA03724@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-06 18:09:51 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 10:09:51 PST

Raw message

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 95 10:09:51 PST
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Subject: Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
In-Reply-To: <9502061025.AA03724@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950206130709.20818A-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 6 Feb 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> Remember, by the way, that PPP is far cheaper per customer than shell
> accounts, even though moronic providers right now don't make it look
> that way.

PPP/SLIP is currently not cheaper per customer - if you figure in the 
time your help desk staff put in over the first couple of weeks of a new 
customer coming on line.  Many people who have barely ever used a BBS are 
deciding they "need their internet connection" and going SLIP/PPP even 
where a shell account would do most of what they want.

-Thomas






Thread