1995-07-13 - Re: Anti-Electronic Racketeering Act of 1995

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: mclow@coyote.csusm.edu (Marshall Clow)
Message Hash: 226f5aeeac89c68fbf034d28516c9c46aa59c6c26f03a251c0e668e42410c48f
Message ID: <9507131646.AA12585@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <ac2afc0c00021003cf47@[144.37.6.21]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-13 16:46:21 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Jul 95 09:46:21 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 95 09:46:21 PDT
To: mclow@coyote.csusm.edu (Marshall Clow)
Subject: Re: Anti-Electronic Racketeering Act of 1995
In-Reply-To: <ac2afc0c00021003cf47@[144.37.6.21]>
Message-ID: <9507131646.AA12585@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Marshall Clow writes:
> >
> >         "(2) to distribute computer software that encodes or encrypts
> >       electronic or digital communications to computer networks that the
> >       person distributing knows, or reasonably should know, is accessible t
o
> >       foreign nationals and foreign governments, regardless of whether such
> >       software has been designated nonexportable."
> >
>     IANAL, but it seems to me that if I EMAIL a copy of PGP to, say, Tim
> May, that I have just "distributed computer software .... to a computer
> network ...accessible to foreign nationals ..." even though it was
> "private" e-mail.

Depends on how "computer network" is defined in the statute.

Perry





Thread