From: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
To: vtw@vtw.org (voters telecom watch)
Message Hash: 4e693267f4cdcb0c60847b2eae1128691be003243d6e969243024a611fd4c8d0
Message ID: <3012a599.flight@flight.hrnowl.lonestar.org>
Reply To: <199507212057.QAA15341@eff.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-23 21:21:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 23 Jul 95 14:21:46 PDT
From: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 95 14:21:46 PDT
To: vtw@vtw.org (voters telecom watch)
Subject: Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974?
In-Reply-To: <199507212057.QAA15341@eff.org>
Message-ID: <3012a599.flight@flight.hrnowl.lonestar.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
OK, OK, OK--
Robbie Westmorland has persuaded me that an action alert before
the bill has been "calendared" could be counterproductive. The reason
is that until the bill is scheduled to come before a committee, many
do not know it exists, and we do not want to tell them! There is a
possibility that the bill might be quietly forgotten about, up to the time
that it is "calendared".
Is there any reason we could not prepare an action alert in advance
to be released immediately when/if it is scheduled to come before
a subcommittee?
- --
Paul Elliott Telephone: 1-713-781-4543
Paul.Elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org Address: 3987 South Gessner #224
Houston Texas 77063
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQCVAgUBMBKzH/BUQYbUhJh5AQFOYQQAjZoFcyAAvncyuwG/fS76gdVuQp5ZrF/M
sHgRk6sRgOKkl0qLBZKlTD14y00r1LaUXgncdJ81usArj7wV+l38Y10+3YALRtl+
RtyqAdeND4rGLgx940juVbnNzMEC8bq4xQJYHUZSFXSrJmEqw0+CmOuMKPrDn44z
4Dcvhg1n94M=
=tibc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1995
Return to “Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>”