From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
To: paul.elliott@Hrnowl.LoneStar.ORG (Paul Elliott)
Message Hash: 748e5279e1d4ea0609ffbacff0e28fe16429623b2c2785cb6137eedf8e345db4
Message ID: <199507212057.QAA15341@eff.org>
Reply To: <300f5b5a.flight@flight.hrnowl.lonestar.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-21 20:58:51 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 Jul 95 13:58:51 PDT
From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 95 13:58:51 PDT
To: paul.elliott@Hrnowl.LoneStar.ORG (Paul Elliott)
Subject: Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974?
In-Reply-To: <300f5b5a.flight@flight.hrnowl.lonestar.org>
Message-ID: <199507212057.QAA15341@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
We've not "bowed out" on this bill, it's just not significant enough a
threat (yet) to warrant stirring up a lot of activism about it - which
would detract from the focus on the CDA and it's clones.
We'll be tracking this bill and will certain help form a campaign against
it if it looks to be going anywhere. In the mean time, we're issuing an
analysis of it, and will keep the net informed.
--
<A HREF="http://www.eff.org/~mech/"> Stanton McCandlish
</A><HR><A HREF="mailto:mech@eff.org"> mech@eff.org
</A><P><A HREF="http://www.eff.org/"> Electronic Frontier Foundation
</A><P> Online Services Mgr.
Return to July 1995
Return to “Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>”