From: cjl <cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
To: E.J.Koops@kub.nl
Message Hash: 9349804cc641e20868584feba88a9a8ef416de15e7d1e9671ef4904e000864d0
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950726134802.10241A-100000@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
Reply To: <2769@umlaw.demon.co.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-26 18:02:22 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Jul 95 11:02:22 PDT
From: cjl <cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 95 11:02:22 PDT
To: E.J.Koops@kub.nl
Subject: Re: Crypto Law Survey
In-Reply-To: <2769@umlaw.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950726134802.10241A-100000@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
This list might usefully be supplemented by an electronic censorship
law review as the two issues are inextricably intertwined. There is a news
piece in the 20th July issue of NATURE saying that in the UK, the Lord
Chancellor, Lord Mackay of Clashfern will be floating draft legislation
to protect ISP's from defamation actions brought about by posts from
their users. Mackay's Defamation Bill does not address USENET and
moderated discussion groups apparently. Do our UK-centric readers have
any more details on the proposals?
C. J. Leonard ( / "DNA is groovy"
\ / - Watson & Crick
<cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu> / \ <-- major groove
( \
Finger for public key \ )
Strong-arm for secret key / <-- minor groove
Thumb-screws for pass-phrase / )
Return to July 1995
Return to “Michael@umlaw.demon.co.uk (Michael Froomkin)”