From: Michael@umlaw.demon.co.uk (Michael Froomkin)
To: E.J.Koops@kub.nl
Message Hash: eba73f81994f4a36621e1afd6292c9177875a536eb08d729866ed9921cdf237b
Message ID: <2769@umlaw.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-07-26 16:30:56 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Jul 95 09:30:56 PDT
From: Michael@umlaw.demon.co.uk (Michael Froomkin)
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 95 09:30:56 PDT
To: E.J.Koops@kub.nl
Subject: Re: Crypto Law Survey
Message-ID: <2769@umlaw.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Thank you for your useful survey. May I make two comments about
the US section? First, many lawyers believe the ITAR to be
unconstitutional as applied to some or all cryptographic
algorithims and software; a court test is likely within the next
few years. Second, the American Bar Association Section on
Science and Technology's Information Security Committee is
drafting Guidelines and Model Legislation which, if they are
ever completed, will improve upon the Utah initiative.
Meanwhile, other states, including California, are considering
bills that are similar to Utah's.
--
Michael Froomkin until Aug 6: michael@umlaw.demon.co.uk
U.Miami School of Law London, England
mfroomki@umiami.ir.miami.edu <-- this will still find me
PO Box 248087 Coral Gables, FL 33124-8087 "Rain in parts, then dry" --BBC
See http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/6095/articles/froomkin-metaphor/text.html
Return to July 1995
Return to “Michael@umlaw.demon.co.uk (Michael Froomkin)”