1995-08-27 - Re: SSL trouble

Header Data

From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
To: Will French <wfrench@interport.net>
Message Hash: 063b4ae4c9eecafdcd69c68c5a9283e504d5ff072e7766e86c941a05e174cef4
Message ID: <199508272252.PAA20854@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <199508270432.AAA20728@interport.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-27 22:52:56 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 27 Aug 95 15:52:56 PDT

Raw message

From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 95 15:52:56 PDT
To: Will French <wfrench@interport.net>
Subject: Re: SSL trouble
In-Reply-To: <199508270432.AAA20728@interport.net>
Message-ID: <199508272252.PAA20854@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



| >   One small point, cryptanalysis equipment is also covered by
| > ITAR restrictions.
| 
|   What is the significance of this rather ominous warning?

And I guess they would consider even brute-forcing code to be 
cryptoanalysis? But not the actual netscape binaries, since they
are for "proper" use. :-(

Sigh. I'm getting tired of all this.

/Christian





Thread