1995-08-16 - Re: SSL challenge – broken !

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: jim@acm.org
Message Hash: 16232e7afd551b1202dcd2b5b7e37740b11927ed6180001e7749c1767046d3b1
Message ID: <199508161832.OAA19556@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199508161806.LAA29214@mycroft.rand.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-16 18:33:43 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Aug 95 11:33:43 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 95 11:33:43 PDT
To: jim@acm.org
Subject: Re: SSL challenge -- broken !
In-Reply-To: <199508161806.LAA29214@mycroft.rand.org>
Message-ID: <199508161832.OAA19556@frankenstein.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Jim Gillogly writes:
> > Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com> writes:
> > I am a little alarmed by the suggestion that this news could have some
> > marked impact on the Netscape stock price.  From our perspective this was
> > certainly an unsurprising result (not to take anything away from Damien
> 
> So far it appears not to have had an effect.  The two web pages I know about
> that track Netscape show it holding steady a point and a half above where it
> opened.  Even the IF market on SSLW doesn't seem to be taking much notice of
> it, despite my attempts at manipulating that market.

I haven't seen any news stories about this on the wire
services. Someone would have to write a story about it first before
people would know...

.pm





Thread