From: Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Message Hash: 24e2a4a8689e4191edf692e2e20e9bf520e492ae1cfc8726adc871e8a24312c1
Message ID: <“swan.cl.cam.:242090:950824214413”@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950824172624.22646F-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-24 21:45:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 14:45:00 PDT
From: Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 14:45:00 PDT
To: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: brloop not working
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950824172624.22646F-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
Message-ID: <"swan.cl.cam.:242090:950824214413"@cl.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> OK - I dig this, but brutessl on my Linux box is still complaining about
> usage...(sorry about the bandwidth but I assume other people are probably
> having similar problems)
OK -- I'll leave CP on the CC list then ...
+ eval brclient -dklLtssl|(read a;nice -20 brutessl - $a)|(read a;echo
$a 1>&2;
echo $a) |brclient -AlLtssl
++ brclient -dklLtssl
++ brclient -AlLtssl
++ read a
++ read a
++ nice -20 brutessl -
That's the problem -- "brclient -dklLtssl" failed to return any keys,
[ congestion of the server :-((( ]
so brutessl was called with just the "-" which brloop put there.
Return to August 1995
Return to “Tom Gillman <syshtg@gsusgi2.Gsu.EDU>”