1995-08-24 - Linux fix was Re: brloop not working

Header Data

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
To: Tom Gillman <syshtg@gsusgi2.Gsu.EDU>
Message Hash: f4994bbc7b65012bf1d4effd8878ffdb1fc15749f6a9d4432e47881eb2c29d69
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950824183000.22646I-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
Reply To: <199508242146.RAA21529@gsusgi2.Gsu.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-24 22:53:09 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 15:53:09 PDT

Raw message

From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 15:53:09 PDT
To: Tom Gillman <syshtg@gsusgi2.Gsu.EDU>
Subject: Linux fix was Re: brloop not working
In-Reply-To: <199508242146.RAA21529@gsusgi2.Gsu.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950824183000.22646I-100000@thrash.src.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 24 Aug 1995, Tom Gillman wrote:

> Use 'nice -20 brutessl -- -' instead. The '--' tells getopts() not to parse
> anything else as arguments, then the next '-' will be interpreted correctly.

I made the change, and while it still chokes when you call brutessl 
without keys (a feature, right?), it DOES work when you get a valid keyspace.

So Linux people might want to change the command in brloop if you are 
getting the same problems I was:

#:10: the actual command to do the work ....
cmd="${cmd-$brclient -dklLt$type|(read a;nice -20 $brute$type -- - \$a)|(read a;

[Huh, like, I wrote more code ;]

-Thomas






Thread