1995-08-31 - Re: Is the book Network Security any good?

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: hallam@w3.org
Message Hash: 6beec90c6ab254a340edd6b758a77d5609c59f964096764691c99443f08748e9
Message ID: <199508310817.EAA24257@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Reply To: <9508310253.AA09578@zorch.w3.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-31 08:17:56 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 31 Aug 95 01:17:56 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 95 01:17:56 PDT
To: hallam@w3.org
Subject: Re: Is the book Network Security any good?
In-Reply-To: <9508310253.AA09578@zorch.w3.org>
Message-ID: <199508310817.EAA24257@frankenstein.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



hallam@w3.org writes:
> It does have some very irritating assertions concerning ASN.1
> however, specifically concerning its use in Kerberos. I consider
> Kerberos's use of ASN.1 to be far superior than the alternative
> suggested which is pure lossage.

I've heard people associated with the decision to use ASN.1 in
Kerberos V say it was a mistake. Frankly, I think ASN.1 is a blight
which should be exterminated from the planet.

But we agree that the book in question is mostly good...

Perry





Thread