1995-08-31 - Re: Is the book Network Security any good?

Header Data

From: hallam@w3.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 77f5e6ca8e25bff86a965a8481efdd55def7943b4626c74845de60732db052c0
Message ID: <9508310253.AA09578@zorch.w3.org>
Reply To: <9508310053.AA01365@cantina.verity.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-31 02:54:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Aug 95 19:54:59 PDT

Raw message

From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 95 19:54:59 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Is the book Network Security any good?
In-Reply-To: <9508310053.AA01365@cantina.verity.com>
Message-ID: <9508310253.AA09578@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>Has anyone read the book "Network Security Private Communication in a 
>PUBLIC World" yet?  It's by Charlie Kaufman, Radia Perlman, and Mike
>Speciner, and has a copyright date of this year.

Its pretty good on security and structure of protocols. Makes a good companion to 
the Schneier book. I use it frequently.

It does have some very irritating assertions concerning ASN.1 however, 
specifically concerning its use in Kerberos. I consider Kerberos's use of ASN.1 
to be far superior than the alternative suggested which is pure lossage. 
Lambasting the use of ASN.1 is fair game but arguments over wasted bytes miss the 
point of ASN.1 and the BER encoding entirely.

It would make a usefull course book. 

	Phill





Thread