From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@it.kth.se>
To: aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
Message Hash: e5c12b204bec3f6f806973972db4597404e8e9ddaa0567238adf80fe50a02f40
Message ID: <199508181654.SAA10686@piraya.electrum.kth.se>
Reply To: <14470.9508181605@exe.dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-18 16:54:56 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 18 Aug 95 09:54:56 PDT
From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@it.kth.se>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 95 09:54:56 PDT
To: aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Where is the key cracking farming software?
In-Reply-To: <14470.9508181605@exe.dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <199508181654.SAA10686@piraya.electrum.kth.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
| Yep there's lots of versions of the brutessl software, ones I know of
| (in no particular order):
|
| - Damien Doligez wrote one
| - Andrew Roos wrote on (this is the one we're using for the challenge)
| - Eric Young wrote one
| - I wrote one
| I think we're ready to start another challenge, this one a
| collaborative project like the brute rc4 one. Just need some
| challenges now (asked Hal about this).
I think it is time this kind of software is outlawed! I mean, it is a
criminal instrument, and the only good it does is to embarrase good
old well-meaning companies trying to make a profit. Besides, the
customers should know better than to buy stuff over the net! And Netscape
said AS IS all the time, didn't they?
(Just joking! :-))
But seriously, I wonder how long it will take before bruteXXX programs
will be classified as "criminal instruments"? As well as real good
random generators, I guess? (I don't think they will outlaw the XOR
op, so to get rid of one-time-pads they have to go for the random gen...)
/Christian
Return to August 1995
Return to “Sam Quigley <poodge@econ.Berkeley.EDU>”