1995-09-17 - Re: Anonymous WWW proxies

Header Data

From: Andrew V. Kovalev <Andrew.V.Kovalev@jet.msk.su>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 063e40435542b76f5592c46b5e78c0cfdf075fafbff362daec332bcb69121068
Message ID: <m0suNA5-0000zSC@jet.msk.su>
Reply To: <9509171010.AA11011@hplyot.obspm.fr>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-17 17:06:38 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Sep 95 10:06:38 PDT

Raw message

From: Andrew V. Kovalev <Andrew.V.Kovalev@jet.msk.su>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 95 10:06:38 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous WWW proxies
In-Reply-To: <9509171010.AA11011@hplyot.obspm.fr>
Message-ID: <m0suNA5-0000zSC@jet.msk.su>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Laurent Demailly wrote:
> 
> Aleph One writes:
>  > Whats the problem of using CERN in proxy mode? You can even set it up do 
>  > to chaining.
> The chaining is not dynamic (but its is maybe patcheable) ? 
> I don't think there is support for encryption (ssl patches maybe?) ?
> Also, CERN httpd is a huge thing, maybe some smaller proxy would
> do... 
> My development is/could be based on my httpd, but simplified... I'll
> have a look at standalone already existing proxies before reinventing
> the wheel...
> 

I am almost sure that new TIS http-gw will do. Especially if ssl will be
added by some kind soul..

				avk

- -- 
- ---
  \/\/\/ Andrew.V.Kovalev@jet.msk.su     +7-095-973-4848 office 
 Security is like defecation - unpleasant, but alternatives are worse.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i

iQBFAwUBMFxVZvLk60Co0vEHAQHYTQF+OWKil3l+o1gGQNw4jpWseQL80Fi9YwRc
ydyRvfkmnFn+5hhpQXLVSlS+WwyWNt1G
=TYGa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Thread