1995-09-27 - Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
Message Hash: 346a7299ae013af050c08db34892d9efb5952161f23e885bd75f347d3a821844
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950927061628.29121A-100000@panix.com>
Reply To: <199509262341.TAA16602@frankenstein.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-27 10:20:22 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Sep 95 03:20:22 PDT

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 95 03:20:22 PDT
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Subject: Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list
In-Reply-To: <199509262341.TAA16602@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950927061628.29121A-100000@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Tue, 26 Sep 1995, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> Who gives a damn, anyway? Its not as though we have a "cypherpunks"
> reputation to uphold.

I don't know about that.  If you read the three WSJ stories on the 
Netscape holes, you find that "Cypherpunks" moves closer to the lead 
'graphs each time.  Soon we'll be the lead.

DCF

"It is to be hoped *not* in a story about major Fibbie crypto busts."

Thread

• Return to September 1995

• Return to “Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>”
• Return to “mkj@october.ducktown.org”

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”

• 1995-09-26 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 09:44:55 PDT) - Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list - mkj@october.ducktown.org
  • 1995-09-27 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 17:30:39 PDT) - Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1995-09-27 (Wed, 27 Sep 95 03:20:22 PDT) - Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>