From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 17:50:12 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
Message-ID: <199509150047.UAA18025@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <v02130501ac7e53505548@[18.157.1.107]>,
joseph@genome.wi.mit.edu (Joseph Sokol-Margolis) wrote:

>Here's my question, and a thought to ponder: If it is/becomes illegal to
>have links on a homepage to pornography because it is ruled as the same as
>having the pornography there; then can you have links to pages with links
>(the same as having it) to pornography? This repeats, so would it be legal
>to links at all?

The answer is trivial. If it pisses of the fascists in power enough, you
go to jail or get killed.

- -- 
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMFjNIyoZzwIn1bdtAQFtXQGAkgf19PR9xYU91knoFXfYCR5NaPyWCcPz
BfpmmPksdMUFCk73R4rMJIc+LruHQGb9
=2aYL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----