1995-09-29 - No Subject
Header Data
From: nelson@santafe.edu (Nelson Minar)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 71ff223da00bb5acda23fd06c6e5710f3156d0668c302541cba2b46a31ce8f79
Message ID: <9509290711.AA07934@sfi.santafe.edu>
Reply To: <199509290439.FAA26254@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-29 07:13:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Sep 95 00:13:24 PDT
Raw message
From: nelson@santafe.edu (Nelson Minar)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 95 00:13:24 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
In-Reply-To: <199509290439.FAA26254@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <9509290711.AA07934@sfi.santafe.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>>Although no encryption system was totally secure, Mr Dent estimated
>>it would take "25 Cray supercomputers a year" to break the STT codes.
>Is it just me, or does someone need to be humbled?
They're certainly calling out for some external evaluation.
Has anyone read the specs? Care to summarize? I'm curious if the "25
crays one year" comment is intended to mean anything, or if it's just
some foolish PR person who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
Thread
Return to September 1995
- Return to “nelson@santafe.edu (Nelson Minar)”
- Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”
- 1995-09-29 (Thu, 28 Sep 95 21:39:53 PDT) - No Subject - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1995-09-29 (Fri, 29 Sep 95 00:13:24 PDT) - No Subject - nelson@santafe.edu (Nelson Minar)
- 1995-09-29 (Fri, 29 Sep 95 00:27:10 PDT) - Re: your mail - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
- 1995-09-29 (Fri, 29 Sep 95 00:13:24 PDT) - No Subject - nelson@santafe.edu (Nelson Minar)