From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: nelson@santafe.edu (Nelson Minar)
Message Hash: fedf5f9b60adc639675b64cebadcbc1a3be777d9f069847f2b5d246f32aa5aa1
Message ID: <199509290722.AAA01028@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <9509290711.AA07934@sfi.santafe.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-29 07:27:10 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Sep 95 00:27:10 PDT
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 95 00:27:10 PDT
To: nelson@santafe.edu (Nelson Minar)
Subject: Re: your mail
In-Reply-To: <9509290711.AA07934@sfi.santafe.edu>
Message-ID: <199509290722.AAA01028@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
As if the ITAR would allow something like that to be exported?
As if microsoft would actually produce a product which the ITAR
wouldn't allow to export?
Sounds like PR bullshit. Compared to this Netscape's PR looks
-good-.
Stay tuned for Hack Microsoft. Community ConneXion gets into
the T-shirt biz. ;-)
>
> >>Although no encryption system was totally secure, Mr Dent estimated
> >>it would take "25 Cray supercomputers a year" to break the STT codes.
> >Is it just me, or does someone need to be humbled?
>
> They're certainly calling out for some external evaluation.
>
> Has anyone read the specs? Care to summarize? I'm curious if the "25
> crays one year" comment is intended to mean anything, or if it's just
> some foolish PR person who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
>
--
sameer Voice: 510-601-9777
Community ConneXion FAX: 510-601-9734
An Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org
Return to September 1995
Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”