1995-09-16 - Re: “alt.cypherpunks” Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?

Header Data

From: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 725ae872a5a3bb7aded7203b26d8f9145de57e86ea89c9a4c94afed394a48270
Message ID: <9509161930.AA08524@spirit.aud.alcatel.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-16 19:30:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Sep 95 12:30:17 PDT

Raw message

From: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 95 12:30:17 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
Message-ID: <9509161930.AA08524@spirit.aud.alcatel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Although Tim is quite happy with Eudora's (or whatever it is)
email handeling techniques, I would also prefer a way in
which to use my Usenet tools on the cypherpunks list.

BUT

I think that making it a newgroup opens up the volume to
a level far beyond what it is now.  It will also result
in a far larger level of "noise" due mostly to cross-posts.

My plan is to gate cypherpunks to a local newsgroup
(local to my machine only) and read it that way.  Is 
it more work for me that way? - yes, but I'ld prefer to 
do the extra work required than loose what this group
has as a mailing list.

Now - if someone wants to start a seperate alt.cypherpunks
group, but *NOT* gateway this list to it - be my guest.
People can then vote with their feet which is the better
"medium" or transport method.

Dan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Oelke                                  Alcatel Network Systems
droelke@aud.alcatel.com                             Richardson, TX






Thread