From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: MIGUELDIAZ@megaweb.com (Miguel Diaz)
Message Hash: 80ff752e63db7cbf58c80181fb590ecf577e8e31aaf8496a740d858fe2866ecc
Message ID: <199509220128.VAA01900@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199509211044.GAA25896@mail-e1a.megaweb.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-22 01:28:55 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 18:28:55 PDT
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 18:28:55 PDT
To: MIGUELDIAZ@megaweb.com (Miguel Diaz)
Subject: Re: Seeds which depend on machine states
In-Reply-To: <199509211044.GAA25896@mail-e1a.megaweb.com>
Message-ID: <199509220128.VAA01900@frankenstein.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Miguel Diaz writes:
> It is my suspicion that seeds which depend on machine
> states(ie state of your computer at a specific instance of
> time) would always be subject to scrutiny and de-cryption.
> As long as the software used to encrypt is not self-modifying,
> the machine state can (through careful manipulation involving
> temperature, clocks, processes etc)always be replicated and
> fixed to an acceptable degree.
Try getting a human to type with the same timing, to microsecond
precision, the same way twice.
Perry
Return to September 1995
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”