1995-09-07 - Re: GAK

Header Data

From: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
To: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Message Hash: 96d5acd3eb7b993a54a124e63753dc013ee29153047e18c88829e702077ab458
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950907135630.13108A-100000@rwd.goucher.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.D-G.3.91.950903212120.8430B-100000@dg.thepoint.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-07 19:12:59 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Sep 95 12:12:59 PDT

Raw message

From: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 95 12:12:59 PDT
To: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Subject: Re: GAK
In-Reply-To: <Pine.D-G.3.91.950903212120.8430B-100000@dg.thepoint.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950907135630.13108A-100000@rwd.goucher.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 3 Sep 1995, Brian Davis wrote:

> I, of course, know of the "dislike" of GAK here.  I am curious to know, 
> however, if the "dislike" is because government would have access under 
> any circumstances or if the primary worry is that government will cheat 
> and get access when most would agree that they shouldn't (either by the 
> judge "cheating" or a TLA stealing it).

...or "somebody else" (ie commercial competitor, personal or political 
rival, etc) paying off somebody to obtain it.  I don't trust the gvm't to 
only get access when they should, either.

> In other words ... if it took agreement by a review board composed of 
> non-LEA members of this list, would the escrow be acceptable??

Not necessarily; the members of the review board can be bribed, 
blackmailed, lied to, etc.  I don't believe there's a competent review 
board available...nor do I think such a thing could be created.

Jon
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lasser                <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>            (410)494-3072 
          Visit my home page at http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/
  You have a friend at the NSA: Big Brother is watching. Finger for PGP key.






Thread