1995-09-04 - Re: pseudonyms & list health

Header Data

From: Deranged Mutant <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Message Hash: dcef9fecccf90d1f88f2d5e00aa910c393331589dc5c6bce8e499b8f719a4cce
Message ID: <199509040505.BAA05115@csws5.ic.sunysb.edu>
Reply To: <199509040451.VAA23173@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-04 05:06:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 22:06:16 PDT

Raw message

From: Deranged Mutant <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 22:06:16 PDT
To: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal)
Subject: Re: pseudonyms & list health
In-Reply-To: <199509040451.VAA23173@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <199509040505.BAA05115@csws5.ic.sunysb.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

*My* willingness to use such a system would depend on the system. Of course,
if you create such a system there will be somebody who uses it... how well
and in what circumstances, and how many people, use it, is another matter.

My worry is about abuse.  One would prefer to save endorsements and find
a way to remove thumbs-downs... also how to prevent one from overdoing a
thumbs-up or -down certification for a person (either to inflate or de-
flate a reputation).

In terms of persons, I see this more as an electronic equivalent of medals
awards, or those nifty little smiley stickers my second grade teacher used
to give.  After a while they become meaningless.

Systems to rate web-sites, newsgroups, etc. in terms of specific qualities
(sexual content, religious sentiment, useful information, technical/skill
level of material, size of posts/files, etc.) that showed the given
ratings of various organizations or people who were certified to rate on
that system would be good... if implemented properly.