1995-10-10 - Re: Java bugs found?

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1dcb13a91a4cd6afe395c4809a11b5c1b54e4a5f61598e7229575ceccc6fc820
Message ID: <199510100349.XAA20771@book.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-10 03:51:59 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 9 Oct 95 20:51:59 PDT

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 95 20:51:59 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Java bugs found?
Message-ID: <199510100349.XAA20771@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <199510100145.SAA00403@lux.reich.com>, Richard_Reich@reich.com
(Richard Reich) wrote:

> After I noticed the file had been pulled, I recovered its contents from my 
> netscape cache (thanks, netscape!):
> 
>   Netscape was notified on Sunday 10/8/95 by Sun Microsystems that there
> is a serious security hole in their Java system [...]

So much for guaranteed security. There is one question on my mind. Why do
today's programs have to try to do it all? Why the heck does a
wordprocessor have to ship with a compiler built in? Not to mention that
there seems to be a disturbing tendency to "feature" automatic execution
of arbitrary code submitted by third parties.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMHntWioZzwIn1bdtAQHqMgGAmc0lpXKiDZPCxZxFmQOKvgwm8Y/RRFca
rTfkfyvbdofFklrivaMy+tuuLddZRHo8
=lnto
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread