1995-10-10 - Re: Java bugs found?

Header Data

From: Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Message Hash: 738c7f490afcf1cbe3cb1a777d5a3482732b2c7d9d120d94eb22497c1f948602
Message ID: <199510100450.AAA12123@clark.net>
Reply To: <199510100349.XAA20771@book.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-10 04:50:34 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 9 Oct 95 21:50:34 PDT

Raw message

From: Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 95 21:50:34 PDT
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: Re: Java bugs found?
In-Reply-To: <199510100349.XAA20771@book.hks.net>
Message-ID: <199510100450.AAA12123@clark.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> So much for guaranteed security. There is one question on my mind. Why do
> today's programs have to try to do it all? Why the heck does a
> wordprocessor have to ship with a compiler built in? Not to mention that

  Possibly because it makes applications a lot more usable if they are
extensible.

-Ray




Thread