1995-10-13 - Re: 90%

Header Data

From: tomw@orac.engr.sgi.com (Tom Weinstein)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2dba98b3897893aafe507ecc7307002ce6fd717a57a66a328fbbe4d350ab258a
Message ID: <199510132358.QAA06931@orac.engr.sgi.com>
Reply To: <m0t3aMe-000KBGC@mail.infinet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-13 23:59:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Oct 95 16:59:07 PDT

Raw message

From: tomw@orac.engr.sgi.com (Tom Weinstein)
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 95 16:59:07 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: 90%
In-Reply-To: <m0t3aMe-000KBGC@mail.infinet.com>
Message-ID: <199510132358.QAA06931@orac.engr.sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

In article <DGDAHw.1t@sgi.sgi.com>, Michael James Gebis <m-gebis@students.uiuc.edu> writes:
> In uiuc.mlist.cypherpunks zoetrope writes:
>> Can I ask a question....are you guys into cryptology for the interesting
>> facts and knowledge or fer cracking unix codes and raising havoc?

> _I_ got into it for the chicks.  Upon reflection it seems that it may not
> have worked as well as I might have hoped. :)

Yeah, definitely for all those crypto-groupies.

Sure we spend a lot of money, but that doesn't mean    |  Tom Weinstein
we *do* anything.  --  Washington DC motto             |  tomw@engr.sgi.com