From: Alex Tang <altitude@cic.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 95 00:36:51 PDT
To: baldwin@RSA.COM
Subject: Re: RSA's comments on RC4 weak keys
In-Reply-To: <199510010537.AAA09694@alpha.jpunix.com>
Message-ID: <199510010736.DAA09592@petrified.cic.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sun Oct  1 01:37:01 1995: you scribbled...
> 
> Robert W. Baldwin <baldwin@RSA.COM> wrote:
> 
> > Here is our response to the excellent work that Andrew Roos has been
> > doing on RC4.  I am glad that people are looking at RC4 critically.

Hi.  This is a pretty intresting statement.  

Does this mean that RSA acknowledges the fact that RC4 can no longer claim
"Trade Secret" status, and therefore will stop trying to make people get a
license to use RC4?

Thanx.

...alex...


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Alex Tang <altitude@umich.edu> or Alex Tang <altitude@cic.net>

iQCVAwUBMG5E9qNd+TOtm9v5AQGWbAP9EtKLfLsz5Vw1ltkyFxhFoTGCBmxngMzg
wlNQfDJ4Qp52HwKnVZGUgxeYYzH5SNT5xRnYzjITUd6tRBI5SRO+/5DQYYLcT1/N
GXYqT7nZ5R5+SXd4XGDmzqNweW42E0HD4QPpc1Qmr+QxoCpmFb9WJZ6Onh++rAu7
abH3sNIWQsk=
=FZer
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----