1995-10-01 - Re: RSA’s comments on RC4 weak keys

Header Data

From: “Mr. Boffo” <mixmaster@vishnu.alias.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d64e11a6571c621e6e10e6abb5d8a5548f8d76eda57e607ff653bff58a43c914
Message ID: <199510010537.AAA09694@alpha.jpunix.com>
Reply To: <9508298124.AA812423895@snail.rsa.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-01 05:49:38 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 30 Sep 95 22:49:38 PDT

Raw message

From: "Mr. Boffo" <mixmaster@vishnu.alias.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 95 22:49:38 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: RSA's comments on RC4 weak keys
In-Reply-To: <9508298124.AA812423895@snail.rsa.com>
Message-ID: <199510010537.AAA09694@alpha.jpunix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Robert W. Baldwin <baldwin@RSA.COM> wrote:

> Here is our response to the excellent work that Andrew Roos has been
> doing on RC4.  I am glad that people are looking at RC4 critically.

Oh really?  A year ago you didn't want anyone looking at RC4 at all!

But since you now seem to be for open review, we'd be happy to
cryptanalyze RC2 for ya also.  :)

Thread

• Return to September 1995

• Return to October 1995

• Return to “Alex Tang <altitude@cic.net>”
• Return to ““baldwin” <baldwin@RSA.COM (Robert W. Baldwin)>”

• Return to ““Mr. Boffo” <mixmaster@vishnu.alias.net>”

• 1995-09-30 (Fri, 29 Sep 95 18:19:08 PDT) - RSA’s comments on RC4 weak keys - “baldwin” <baldwin@RSA.COM (Robert W. Baldwin)>
  • 1995-10-01 (Sat, 30 Sep 95 22:49:38 PDT) - Re: RSA’s comments on RC4 weak keys - “Mr. Boffo” <mixmaster@vishnu.alias.net>
    • 1995-10-01 (Sun, 1 Oct 95 00:36:51 PDT) - Re: RSA’s comments on RC4 weak keys - Alex Tang <altitude@cic.net>