1995-10-25 - Quick commercial package question

Header Data

From: Jonathon Fletcher <jonathon@doemail.sbi.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5f6d7055f0c11a76edf90390142ea588c1627558a7624379afcbe6a41a0280cf
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951025122602.8492M-100000@doe905f>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-25 03:34:49 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 20:34:49 PDT

Raw message

From: Jonathon Fletcher <jonathon@doemail.sbi.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 20:34:49 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Quick commercial package question
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951025122602.8492M-100000@doe905f>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Just a brief question.

  There's a compression/archiving package on the Mac call Stuffit. It
comes in the usual Lite (get free then register) and Deluxe (money first,
product later) flavours. It offers, amongst it's options, an encryption
option on a 'per archive entry'. This means you can have an archive with a
mix of encrypted and unencrypted files and folders, all in the same
archive. 

  Question is - does anyone know anything about the strength or
trustability of the encryption algorithm used ? It's freely exportable
from the US (or so I thought) so it can't be DES. Is it (down) on a level
with the MS Word or Wordperfect ciphers, or is it a little better ? How
far should I trust it ? 

-Jon

--
  Jonathon Fletcher,        "these opinions are my own, no-one else's"
  jonathon@japan.sbi.com






Thread