1995-10-12 - Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
Header Data
From: Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Message Hash: 885930025a7831b188ad891a428eef5caba7ba31aa41847f410f2396e151c0cc
Message ID: <“swan.cl.cam.:277260:951012071149”@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reply To: <199510120421.VAA29813@infinity.c2.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-12 07:12:29 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Oct 95 00:12:29 PDT
Raw message
From: Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 95 00:12:29 PDT
To: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Subject: Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
In-Reply-To: <199510120421.VAA29813@infinity.c2.org>
Message-ID: <"swan.cl.cam.:277260:951012071149"@cl.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Not possible. Reporters don't call you for a quote and then send you a draft
> of the article for your approval before they publish. They call for a quote,
> write their article, and publish, not asking for approval.
Depends how well you train them !
If you can get through to them that it is in their interest to get the facts
right, you may find that they get back to you ...
I try to get them to send the draft as email or fax, but instead I get it read
over the phone to me :-(
Thread
Return to October 1995
- Return to “David Berger <dvberger@eit.COM>”
- Return to “Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>”
- Return to “Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>”
Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”
- 1995-10-12 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 18:51:36 PDT) - Re: NYT on Internet Flaws - David Berger <dvberger@eit.COM>
- 1995-10-12 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 21:26:50 PDT) - Re: NYT on Internet Flaws - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
- 1995-10-12 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 00:12:29 PDT) - Re: NYT on Internet Flaws - Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
- 1995-10-12 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 03:41:31 PDT) - Re: NYT on Internet Flaws - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
- 1995-10-12 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 00:12:29 PDT) - Re: NYT on Internet Flaws - Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
- 1995-10-12 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 21:26:50 PDT) - Re: NYT on Internet Flaws - sameer <sameer@c2.org>