1995-10-12 - Re: NYT on Internet Flaws

Header Data

From: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
To: Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk (Piete Brooks)
Message Hash: af8fb15bc2add47d2bc78cc99e9a340bff4dc817e08f92581dd9257b83b53711
Message ID: <199510120923.AA47909@junkers.lochard.com.au>
Reply To: <“swan.cl.cam.:277260:951012071149”@cl.cam.ac.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-12 10:41:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Oct 95 03:41:31 PDT

Raw message

From: Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 95 03:41:31 PDT
To: Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk (Piete Brooks)
Subject: Re: NYT on Internet Flaws
In-Reply-To: <"swan.cl.cam.:277260:951012071149"@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <199510120923.AA47909@junkers.lochard.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


>> Not possible. Reporters don't call you for a quote and then send you a draft
>> of the article for your approval before they publish. They call for a quote,
>> write their article, and publish, not asking for approval.
>
>Depends how well you train them !

Lets train them. Someone post their email addresses so we can send them all
the RFCs for their education. :) They need to know what the hell they are
talking about.

I wonder if the biology lists get this, some wannabe hero posting how billions
of people are infected with deadly toxins just because some researcher
mentioned a well known fact that an amount of various bacteria and toxins
exist in all living mammals.

Werd.
Mark




Thread