1995-10-07 - Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again…)
Header Data
From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9b23a472cadaff0fe5e0680c0cea94b1e7dc841a6d5412f0f607f6240a8ed765
Message ID: <199510070400.VAA12311@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: <199510070102.TAA14826@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-07 04:02:00 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Oct 95 21:02:00 PDT
Raw message
From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 95 21:02:00 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again...)
In-Reply-To: <199510070102.TAA14826@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
Message-ID: <199510070400.VAA12311@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Although I have been in effect arguing against using unsigned and
uncertified keys, I don't think the PGP web of trust model works that
well either. I have an essay on this at <URL:
http://www.portal.com/~hfinney/web_of_trust.html>.
Hal
Thread
Return to October 1995
- Return to “Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>”
- Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
- Return to “Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>”
Return to “Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>”
- 1995-10-07 (Fri, 6 Oct 95 18:02:50 PDT) - MITM attacks and True Names (again…) - Bryce <wilcoxb@nagina.cs.colorado.edu>
- 1995-10-07 (Fri, 6 Oct 95 21:02:00 PDT) - Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again…) - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1995-10-12 (Wed, 11 Oct 95 21:01:12 PDT) - Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again…) - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
- 1995-10-12 (Thu, 12 Oct 95 03:33:21 PDT) - Re: MITM attacks and True Names (again…) - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>