From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Dave Dittrich <dittrich@cac.washington.edu>
Message Hash: b353fab8be7c4be675a09773dd6253759f0b3fed94ffe839785c6a2486855e39
Message ID: <199510030445.AAA29715@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Reply To: <9510021817.AA01271@red2.cac.washington.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-03 04:45:15 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Oct 95 21:45:15 PDT
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 95 21:45:15 PDT
To: Dave Dittrich <dittrich@cac.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
In-Reply-To: <9510021817.AA01271@red2.cac.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <199510030445.AAA29715@frankenstein.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Dave Dittrich writes:
>
> > Perry writes, regarding alpha decay counts for random numbers:
> >
> > > And, as I noted, there are RS232 interfaceable radiation detectors you
> > > can buy off the shelf -- no hardware hacking needed.
> I was thinking about this the other day and wondered if it wouldn't be
> cheap and relatively easy to build a board that samples and sums
> several randomly selected signals on various frequencies on the AM
> broadcast spectrum.
Radio signals can be interfered with or listened to -- never
underestimate the opponent. Computer interfaced radiation detectors,
in spite of Tim's claim to the contrary, are pretty cheap and very
hard to interfere with.
Perry
Return to October 1995
Return to “Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>”