1995-10-26 - Re: CJR returned to sender

Header Data

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c4f82954d0bca1f2eac8ce6eb7beb5031dc4ea75e119e01fb90ddb0395a73ea4
Message ID: <308F2B18.6BDA@netscape.com>
Reply To: <acb323bd030210041822@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-26 06:45:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 14:45:30 +0800

Raw message

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 14:45:30 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CJR returned to sender
In-Reply-To: <acb323bd030210041822@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <308F2B18.6BDA@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Michael Froomkin wrote:
> 
> I agree strongly with Tim May that this (fun) little joke has gone far
> enough.  I enjoyed it while it lasted, but the CJR was clearly frivolous,
> the T-Shirt was clearly not a munition, IMHO, and that's that.  Write up
> the experience, post it on the web somewhere (I'll provide a space if you
> need it), and call it a day.

  Should they also reject the same content (RSA-PERL) delivered
in any of the following ways:

	Printed on paper
	Printed on paper in OCR font
	Printed on paper in barcode
	Printed on paper with magnetic ink (like checks)

  The lines being drawn here seem very arbitrary.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread