cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-10-27 - Re: CJR returned to sender

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Message Hash: d742afb69f9706fc304a2d463eb691de65ba133e0eb03c656ff4cf442fc84436
Message ID: <199510271446.KAA13555@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951027100225.10892F-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-27 15:47:33 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 23:47:33 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 23:47:33 +0800
To: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Subject: Re: CJR returned to sender
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951027100225.10892F-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
Message-ID: <199510271446.KAA13555@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Michael Froomkin writes:
> And yet people like MIT get approval for the release of PGP this way.
[...]

> If anyone from MIT is reading this, it would be a real public service to 
> put on a web site (a) what the system used for the release of PGP is 
> exactly and (b) what assurances (oral, written, names & dates) was 
> received from State/Commerce that this was legal.

I don't think they got any sort of approval from State or Commerce --
I think they just discussed it with their own lawyers.

Perry

Thread