From: Richard.Johnson@Colorado.EDU (Richard Johnson)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5205d89455eaa586efb8011a8514cf2519cc846abde4495af703f63dcc5249d4
Message ID: <v02130501acc6820ddefd@[204.144.184.50]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-09 00:15:34 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 08:15:34 +0800
From: Richard.Johnson@Colorado.EDU (Richard Johnson)
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 08:15:34 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Photuris 512bit Prime Challenge? (Re: Photuris Primality verification needed)
Message-ID: <v02130501acc6820ddefd@[204.144.184.50]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hilarie Orman <ho@cs.arizona.edu> wrote:
>> Well, since we already require 56-bit DES in ESP in the interests of
>> promoting basic interoperability, wouldn't a 512-bit prime be
>> similarly sufficient?
>
>If you are willing to accept that in all likelihood, one year from
>now, some group will announce that can "crack" all key exchanges that
>using the published modulus, then sure, call it sufficient.
Sounds like someone just threw down a gauntlet.
Is it even possible to do the precomputations in a distributed manner in
less than a year or two? Or maybe starting a few years down the road?
It would be nice to give Photuris a chance to get established before the
least common denoninator shared modulus gets taken out, if we even can
take it out.
Richard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMKDVvfobez3wRbTBAQHpkgP9Fg+MGMz8U6Bisv45PZohoZxWbiEYuxJK
tg8oHD8TZRQsuqCwveWFRTnmPGiGKs2cBs5ZKXkFNU6ot7lZLO8d/1BSSjo0yX2Q
0FSXDSaBjUKIFcjHHGYBWrZZ+gjc/bdab94EqQvmFSUmAp73/mnKZgcyUPGL3Cmt
MW3jZhlVMdw=
=bfsQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to November 1995
Return to “Richard.Johnson@Colorado.EDU (Richard Johnson)”