1995-11-27 - Re: The future will be easy to use

Header Data

From: jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 567fa132938a2c2d2e7c00662835c97aa71fb99e5393fb25ed8c991f5efde612
Message ID: <9511272256.AA13473@monad.semcor.com>
Reply To: <v02120d08acdfd6f40be1@[157.22.240.13]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-27 23:14:00 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 07:14:00 +0800

Raw message

From: jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 07:14:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The future will be easy to use
In-Reply-To: <v02120d08acdfd6f40be1@[157.22.240.13]>
Message-ID: <9511272256.AA13473@monad.semcor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


One more time for the security/cypher-impared (me at least).

I suspect there are a fair number of lurkers here who code for a living
and would be willing to contribute if someone/the_group can articulate
a requirements statement and then push it to the design stage.

I bring nothing cypher-wise. I would be willing to help walk the
s/w-engineering dog and to write Motif/X/socket if the chosen platform
is UN*X, however.

So, from an engineering standpoint, what should the "future" look
like?

jps
-- 
Jack P. Starrantino     (215) 674-0200 (voice)
SEMCOR, Inc.            (215) 443-0474 (fax)
65 West Street Road     jps@semcor.com
Suite C-100
Warminster, PA 18974





Thread