jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino) (7 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail…

• 1995-10-09 (Mon, 9 Oct 95 07:42:11 PDT) - Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail… - jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino)
  • 1995-10-09 (Mon, 9 Oct 95 07:58:31 PDT) - Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail… - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
    • 1995-10-09 (Mon, 9 Oct 95 08:53:23 PDT) - Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail… - “Josh M. Osborne” <stripes@va.pubnix.com>
      • 1995-10-09 (Mon, 9 Oct 95 16:06:02 PDT) - Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail… - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        • 1995-10-10 (Mon, 9 Oct 95 17:07:54 PDT) - Re: netscape mail starts java attachments upon get new mail… - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Re: responce to graphic encryption replies

• 1995-10-14 (Fri, 13 Oct 95 19:40:12 PDT) - Re: responce to graphic encryption replies - jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino)
  • 1995-10-18 (Tue, 17 Oct 95 21:19:35 PDT) - Re: responce to graphic encryption replies - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>

Re: The future will be easy to use

• 1995-11-27 (Tue, 28 Nov 1995 05:20:26 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - Jonathan Zamick <JonathanZ@consensus.com>
  • 1995-11-27 (Tue, 28 Nov 1995 05:57:51 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - Raph Levien <raph@c2.org>
  • 1995-11-27 (Tue, 28 Nov 1995 07:14:00 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino)
    • 1995-11-28 (Tue, 28 Nov 1995 09:54:55 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - James Black <black@sunflash.eng.usf.edu>

Re: The future will be easy to use

• 1995-11-28 (Tue, 28 Nov 1995 12:44:49 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
  • 1995-11-29 (Wed, 29 Nov 1995 22:48:49 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino)

Re: latest librand source now av

• 1995-12-07 (Thu, 7 Dec 95 07:16:05 PST) - Re: latest librand source now av - jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino)

Re: Secured RM ? (source)

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-12-15 (Fri, 15 Dec 1995 23:10:08 +0800) - Re: Secured RM ? (source) - jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino)
    • 1995-12-17 (Sun, 17 Dec 1995 12:58:04 +0800) - Re: Secured RM ? (source) - Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
      • 1995-12-17 (Sun, 17 Dec 1995 18:37:47 +0800) - Re: Secured RM ? (source) - Ben Holiday <ncognito@gate.net>

Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek!

• 1995-12-22 (Fri, 22 Dec 95 00:00:39 PST) - Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek! - Light Ray <fricke@mae.engr.ucdavis.edu>
  • 1995-12-22 (Fri, 22 Dec 95 08:37:15 PST) - Re: Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek! - Sten Drescher <stend@cris.com>
    • 1995-12-22 (Sat, 23 Dec 1995 03:58:39 +0800) - Re: Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek! - fc@all.net (Fred Cohen)
  • 1995-12-22 (Sat, 23 Dec 1995 04:08:10 +0800) - Re: Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek! - jps@monad.semcor.com (Jack P. Starrantino)