1995-11-17 - Re: SA: Confidential Communication on the Internet

Header Data

From: Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
To: michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
Message Hash: 5dab20707feebebf29f579201b283382915b6f657275254257f22362151f200a
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.90.951117105324.3208A-100000@dfw.net>
Reply To: <199511171627.LAA17236@fuseki.aa.ans.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-17 16:58:54 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 17 Nov 95 08:58:54 PST

Raw message

From: Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 95 08:58:54 PST
To: michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
Subject: Re: SA: Confidential Communication on the Internet
In-Reply-To: <199511171627.LAA17236@fuseki.aa.ans.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.90.951117105324.3208A-100000@dfw.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


No I think you did. The main point I guess was that there system acomplished
athentication, as well as privacy. But like I said lite on the technical 
side. And I agree, it spent more time talking about what it encryption,
public keys exchange, and certificates, than answering what diferent in 
their system than any of the otehr out there.

 On Fri, 17 Nov 1995, michael shiplett wrote:

>   This seemed to be a duplication of an X.509 certificate hierarchy:
> ``Hey, I don't know who you are but you have a seals which go back to
> a CA I trust.'' In this respect the information seemed unworthy of an
> article in SA.
> 
> Perhaps I did not read the article closely enough?
> 
> michael
> 

Aleph One / aleph1@dfw.net
http://underground.org/
KeyID 1024/948FD6B5 
Fingerprint EE C9 E8 AA CB AF 09 61  8C 39 EA 47 A8 6A B8 01 






Thread