1995-11-17 - Re: SA: Confidential Communication on the Internet

Header Data

From: michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e00f2ce51bfa328d7796c20793f8662e47d0341daec981d871f99dd28aa852dc
Message ID: <199511171627.LAA17236@fuseki.aa.ans.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.90.951117010848.21461A@dfw.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-17 16:45:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Nov 1995 00:45:25 +0800

Raw message

From: michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 1995 00:45:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SA: Confidential Communication on the Internet
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.90.951117010848.21461A@dfw.net>
Message-ID: <199511171627.LAA17236@fuseki.aa.ans.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


"ao" == Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net> writes:

ao> On the December issue of Scientific American there is an article
ao> by Thomas Beth, "Confidential Communication on the Internet".
ao> Lite on the technical side but good reading anyway.

  This seemed to be a duplication of an X.509 certificate hierarchy:
``Hey, I don't know who you are but you have a seals which go back to
a CA I trust.'' In this respect the information seemed unworthy of an
article in SA.

Perhaps I did not read the article closely enough?

michael





Thread