From: “Ed Carp (ecarp@netcom.com)” <ecarp@netcom.com>
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Message Hash: 0374383675a219db56ec05890e499055a3441444fc821bffb632a9ec2a1824d0
Message ID: <199512122017.OAA20584@khijol>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-12 21:47:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 05:47:36 +0800
From: "Ed Carp (ecarp@netcom.com)" <ecarp@netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 05:47:36 +0800
To: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: EXON
Message-ID: <199512122017.OAA20584@khijol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 23:10:25 -0800 (PST)
> From: Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
> To: Scott Binkley <SBinkley@atitech.ca>
> Cc: High Society List <cypherpunks@toad.com>
> Subject: Re: EXON
> On 11 Dec 1995, Scott Binkley wrote:
>
> > Could someone please explain to me what this "EXON" thing is??
>
> A nucleic acid chain (RNA or DNA) is composed of exons, which are
> "active" sequences of nucleotides that are expressed as polypeptides, and
> "introns," what is known as "junk DNA." Only about 2% of the 6 billion or
> so base pairs that make up the human genome are exons.
>
> (There is some controversy in molecular biology circles as to whether
> "junk DNA" is really "junk" just because it doesn't build proteins. It
> could perform a regulatory or "frame-check" function.)
Actually, I think that once the matter is further studied, scientists
will discover that the "junk DNA" is not junk, but inactive DNA,
waiting for a "trigger".
Return to December 1995
Return to “zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>”