1995-12-06 - Re: Secret Clearance

Header Data

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: holovacs@styx.ios.com (Jay Holovacs)
Message Hash: 29414743f1e4e84e347d2bd0ded1fc84386948425dbcff3236dbfc56f3088d41
Message ID: <199512061318.IAA11175@nrk.com>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9512060640.A22538-0100000@styx.ios.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-06 13:21:21 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Dec 95 05:21:21 PST

Raw message

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 95 05:21:21 PST
To: holovacs@styx.ios.com (Jay Holovacs)
Subject: Re: Secret Clearance
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9512060640.A22538-0100000@styx.ios.com>
Message-ID: <199512061318.IAA11175@nrk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> I think it's interesting that police and even FBI that normally operate 
> "legally authorized" wiretaps do not require SECRET clearance. What 
> really goes on here?

??
Feeb's have TS clearances, at least the ones I've dealt with.
I strongly doubt any don't..

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433




Thread