1995-12-06 - re: Secret Clearance

Header Data

From: Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: ca52eaf38c0e7addf7e75b30a5f1beb6f5f1f4fe4a3260157baf334d254bc36b
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9512060640.A22538-0100000@styx.ios.com>
Reply To: <199512060445.FAA22949@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-06 12:01:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Dec 95 04:01:50 PST

Raw message

From: Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 95 04:01:50 PST
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: re: Secret Clearance
In-Reply-To: <199512060445.FAA22949@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9512060640.A22538-0100000@styx.ios.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I think it's interesting that police and even FBI that normally operate 
"legally authorized" wiretaps do not require SECRET clearance. What 
really goes on here?

Jay Holovacs <holovacs@ios.com>
PGP Key fingerprint =  AC 29 C8 7A E4 2D 07 27  AE CA 99 4A F6 59 87 90 
 (KEY id 1024/80E4AA05) email me for key

Thread

• Return to December 1995

• Return to “David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>”
• Return to “Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>”

• Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”

• 1995-12-06 (Tue, 5 Dec 95 20:44:07 PST) - re: Secret Clearance - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 04:01:50 PST) - re: Secret Clearance - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
    • 1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 05:21:21 PST) - Re: Secret Clearance - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>