From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 12:40:44 +0800
To: tallpaul <tallpaul@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: Is ths legal?...
In-Reply-To: <199512170131.UAA03707@pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951216220159.26525A-100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 16 Dec 1995, tallpaul wrote:

> Second, if it is true, people frequently define the ability to do something
> as a "privledge" not a "right." As in a hypothetical "Use of student
> accounts at O.U. is a privledge extended to the students by the University.
> By using our computer you keep to our rules, including abandoning any
> notion you might have that your communications are in any way private" etc.
> etc. 

I believe there is a supreme court case that essentially says that a 
public entity cannot define something as either privledge or right.  I'm 
not sure the name, but the EFF has an abstract available.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: PGP Signed with PineSign 2.2

iQCVAwUBMNN6WjokqlyVGmCFAQG6BwQAqqJhzk7BzJ+9Gmbl8Esf+8zcxVzEfAw+
GgPr8AMNz0KzgkOHDZsQOwqFM5wVqkpk8bzSUTCHu5YW8/ORfXHB7b/lmn03qkBd
ZZFEldfhoZFINfm4tdAd/8YfWF0WZeXiuDsRqJA/V4iRyIRj9+axpUPOFefDqkMD
gQR8KyPuSrw=
=Wagv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
____           Robert A. Hayden      <=> hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu
\  /__     Finger for Geek Code Info <=>    Finger for PGP Public Key
 \/  /           -=-=-=-=-=-                      -=-=-=-=-=-
   \/        http://krypton.mankato.msus.edu/~hayden/Welcome.html

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GED/J d-- s:++>: a-- C++(++++)$ ULUO++ P+>+++ L++ !E---- W+(---) N+++ o+
K+++ w+(---) O- M+$>++ V-- PS++(+++)>$ PE++(+)>$ Y++ PGP++ t- 5+++ X++
R+++>$ tv+ b+ DI+++ D+++ G+++++>$ e++$>++++ h r-- y+**
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------