From: Michael H. Warfield <mhw@wittsend.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 82d084cf5a40c58e0e937bd21bc4e7efddf53e77d4f8712bdafe596d76e61b35
Message ID: <m0tMMvg-0001TUC@wittsend.com>
Reply To: <199512031959.OAA00178@localhost.cjs.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-03 22:29:53 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Dec 95 14:29:53 PST
From: Michael H. Warfield <mhw@wittsend.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 95 14:29:53 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: your mail
In-Reply-To: <199512031959.OAA00178@localhost.cjs.net>
Message-ID: <m0tMMvg-0001TUC@wittsend.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Christopher J. Shaulis enscribed thusly:
> My mail??
> Who is the wise guy who keeps putting "Your mail" in the topic?
Kidding, right? Snicker.
It's not a who - it's a what. Some twit DID NOT put a subject on the
ORIGINAL message. The next person(s) who replied to him had a mail program
which recognized the lack of a "Subject" and substituted "Your mail". That
beats a subject line of "Subect: Re:"...
Actually and technically they don't bother to "spot" the lack of
a Subject. The programs set their default subject for replys to "Your mail"
and then if the read a Subject header, it overrides the default. I know
elm does and I believe pine does, as well as a host of others.
Works well for personal mail even if it does look STUPID on a
mailing list. Only known cure is to make sure you have a REAL SUBJECT.
> Christopher
--
Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw@WittsEnd.com
(The Mad Wizard) | (770) 925-8248 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
Return to December 1995
Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”