1995-12-05 - [Mix-L] WARNING: sting via remailer! (fwd)

Header Data

From: Bryan Strawser <bstrawse@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9ea1d6da69a6a18fb32a18e38f82e6002abde64f84497a1b6454da7925187e3d
Message ID: <199512051407.JAA18236@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-05 14:06:15 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Dec 95 06:06:15 PST

Raw message

From: Bryan Strawser <bstrawse@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 95 06:06:15 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: [Mix-L] WARNING: sting via remailer! (fwd)
Message-ID: <199512051407.JAA18236@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Forwarded message:
> From owner-mix-l@alpha.jpunix.com  Tue Dec  5 09:03:10 1995
> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 1995 07:55:21 -0600 (CST)
> Message-Id: <199512051355.HAA12202@alpha.jpunix.com>
> To: mix-l@vishnu.alias.net, remailer-operators@c2.org,
>         mail2news@utopia.hacktic.nl
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy, alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.security
> From: "Mr. Boffo" <mixmaster@vishnu.alias.net>
> X-Comment1: This message did not originate from the
> X-Comment2: above address. It was automatically remailed
> X-Comment3: by an anonymous mail service. Please report
> X-Comment4: problems or inappropriate use to
> X-Comment5: <complaints@vishnu.alias.net>
> Subject: [Mix-L] WARNING: sting via remailer!
> Sender: owner-mix-l@jpunix.com
> Precedence: bulk
> 
> 	I was in the federal building coffee shop in Reston, Va. yesterday
> when I overheard a conversation between what appeared to be two FBI agents
> discussing a sting operation involving Mixmaster. Hearing the word
> "mixmaster" naturally caused my ears to perk up and I listened further. 
> 
> 	It appears that the FBI has coerced a mixmaster remailer operator
> into cooperating with them in a sting operation to catch remailers when
> they forward email pertaining to pornography, pedophilia, and copy-written
> software. 
> 
> 	My questions are a) is it possible to perform this type of
> monitoring on a mixmaster remailer and, b) what is the identity of the
> cooperating remailer operator? 
> 
> 	This concerns me greatly as I use remailers to privatize my
> important email regularly and I don't want my identity or my email
> compromised because of a "spook in cypherpunks clothing".
> 


-- 
Bryan Strawser, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA              Remember Waco
bstrawse@indiana.edu                    http://copper.ucs.indiana.edu/~bstrawse




Thread