From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: rsalz@osf.org (Rich Salz)
Message Hash: ad321e69ec91182ebdc06a693aacb05888a27d59c936c268ae17d9ebca336c86
Message ID: <199512042241.OAA22114@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <9512042126.AA25932@sulphur.osf.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-04 22:46:54 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 14:46:54 PST
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 14:46:54 PST
To: rsalz@osf.org (Rich Salz)
Subject: Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
In-Reply-To: <9512042126.AA25932@sulphur.osf.org>
Message-ID: <199512042241.OAA22114@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
As Andrew conveniently pointed out, it doesn't seem that
cybercash suits my purposes very well. I'll contact the addresses
below, and will inform the list of my results. Thanks.
>
> > It doesn't appear that these people seem to care about
> > cash-like anonymous token-based payment schemes. Is that a valid
> > assesment? What is needed to make these people start caring about
> > that?
>
> I didn't go to the meeting. On the other hand, I notice Cybercash people
> in influential positions on the comittee. I'd also contact
> > > From: "Debbie O'Dell" <dlo@dsunix2.dsrd.ornl.gov>
> > > To: Electronic Commerce Working Group Reflector <fstc-ecomm@monroe.llnl.gov>
>
--
sameer Voice: 510-601-9777
Community ConneXion FAX: 510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org
Return to December 1995
Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”