1995-12-04 - Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment

Header Data

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: rsalz@osf.org (Rich Salz)
Message Hash: ad321e69ec91182ebdc06a693aacb05888a27d59c936c268ae17d9ebca336c86
Message ID: <199512042241.OAA22114@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <9512042126.AA25932@sulphur.osf.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-04 22:46:54 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 14:46:54 PST

Raw message

From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 14:46:54 PST
To: rsalz@osf.org (Rich Salz)
Subject: Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
In-Reply-To: <9512042126.AA25932@sulphur.osf.org>
Message-ID: <199512042241.OAA22114@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	As Andrew conveniently pointed out, it doesn't seem that
cybercash suits my purposes very well. I'll contact the addresses
below, and will inform the list of my results. Thanks.

> 
> > 	It doesn't appear that these people seem to care about
> > cash-like anonymous token-based payment schemes. Is that a valid
> > assesment? What is needed to make these people start caring about
> > that?
> 
> I didn't go to the meeting.  On the other hand, I notice Cybercash people
> in influential positions on the comittee.  I'd also contact
> > > From: "Debbie O'Dell" <dlo@dsunix2.dsrd.ornl.gov>
> > > To: Electronic Commerce Working Group Reflector <fstc-ecomm@monroe.llnl.gov>
> 


-- 
sameer						Voice:   510-601-9777
Community ConneXion				FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.org





Thread