1995-12-04 - Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment

Header Data

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: sameer@c2.org
Message Hash: e7f7500c9961f0ef1adc2dc6f5339bd4c1ddfdca99c2e66dea80e4a48eaeea17
Message ID: <9512042126.AA25932@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-04 21:29:39 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 13:29:39 PST

Raw message

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 13:29:39 PST
To: sameer@c2.org
Subject: Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
Message-ID: <9512042126.AA25932@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 	It doesn't appear that these people seem to care about
> cash-like anonymous token-based payment schemes. Is that a valid
> assesment? What is needed to make these people start caring about
> that?

I didn't go to the meeting.  On the other hand, I notice Cybercash people
in influential positions on the comittee.  I'd also contact
> > From: "Debbie O'Dell" <dlo@dsunix2.dsrd.ornl.gov>
> > To: Electronic Commerce Working Group Reflector <fstc-ecomm@monroe.llnl.gov>






Thread