1995-12-03 - Re: Talking to Jim

Header Data

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f93bde96832321a70c50927cf45745b52d552900176ed53945b5fcb19e8d64cd
Message ID: <30C16890.41C6@netscape.com>
Reply To: <199512012310.KAA23844@iccu6.ipswich.gil.com.au>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-03 09:20:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 17:20:46 +0800

Raw message

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 17:20:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Talking to Jim
In-Reply-To: <199512012310.KAA23844@iccu6.ipswich.gil.com.au>
Message-ID: <30C16890.41C6@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> 
> PeterWiltshire writes:
> > I emailed Jim Clark day before yesterday about his comments re key escrow.
> > He responded.  As it's not good form to post private email, might I suggest
> > that one of the 'elders' here put to Jim a list of questions on the proviso
> > that his answers can be posted to the list.  You never know, a lot of
> > speculation might be confirmed or denied.
> 
> Why doesn't he just post on his own? Its not like this mailing list is
> unknown -- we got him bad press on the cover of the Times in the
> past. Anyone is free to send email here.

  Jim offered to send to the list directly, but given the recent gripes
about non-subscribers spamming the list, I thought it might be in bad
form, and offered to forward it to the list for him.  He doesn't really
have time to read cypherpunks himself.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread