1996-01-24 - Re: Crippled Notes export encryption

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0fa95efab3f46096bac6a7933748036fff92f1a404fec3a8fda053f4ea0adbe1
Message ID: <v02120d67ad2c263c30f9@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-24 19:06:58 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 03:06:58 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 03:06:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
Message-ID: <v02120d67ad2c263c30f9@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 4:17 1/24/96, Timothy C. May wrote:

>The usual issue: That if a foreign-originated product even appears to be a
>standard (so far, none have been), and includes strong crypto, then the NSA
>and other agencies will simply change the rules. Thus, if extremely strong
>crypto from "Netscape-Zurich" starts to have a significant market presense
>in the U.S., then some law will be passed to restrict it.

I agree. The reason for enforcing ITAR is to keep good crypto of the
*domestic* market. If ITAR no longer accomplishes that, new laws will be
passed.


-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread