From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: John Young <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 673d18f388e0f78421b0572dad378f8ba0dd819e8c02ebd1c4a7b4c830f9cd8e
Message ID: <v02120d0bad14ee9ba9ef@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-07 04:06:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 12:06:18 +0800
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 12:06:18 +0800
To: John Young <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: please stop the Mitnick stuff
Message-ID: <v02120d0bad14ee9ba9ef@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 21:16 1/6/96, John Young wrote:
> Also, crypto-related: The fact that Shimomura's supposedly
> secret files were not protected by encryption or other
> security is what causes Littman and others to think there
> was a sting (perhaps with TLA help) rather than foolish
> vanity of the security wizard.
[I do belive this has CP relevance.]
Of course it was a set-up. Mitnick got into Shimomura's computer by
impersonating the IP address of one of Shimomura's machines. The router
should have never let packets in from outside that have an IP address that
is supposed to be inside. That a 'security expert' would overlook such a
blatant and well publicized hole in his _own_ router is inconceivable.
Shimomura was trying to get someone to break into his system. If the bait
was specifically for Mitnick, we may never know.
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
Return to January 1996
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”